Vanta Logo
SPONSOR
Automate SOC 2 & ISO 27001 compliance with Vanta. Get $1,000 off.
Published
4 min read
Up to date

Trevor I. Lasn

Staff Software Engineer, Engineering Manager

No, Quantum Computers Won't Break All Encryption

Symmetric encryption algorithms like Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) are largely quantum-resistant already

Think of encryption like securing your valuables. We lock things up because we don’t want strangers looking at our personal stuff or stealing what’s important to us. Just like you wouldn’t leave your wallet on a park bench or your passport on the bus, you don’t want to leave your private information out in the open. There are two main ways we do this:

  1. Using the same key (like your house key) to lock and unlock something. This is what we call AES encryption.
  1. Using different keys (like a mailbox where anyone can put mail in, but only you can open it). This is what we call RSA and ECC encryption.

Quantum computers are really good at solving certain types of math puzzles. It’s like they have a superpower for finding patterns.

So, what’s the fuss about? Well, the mailbox-style encryption (RSA and ECC) relies on math puzzles which quantum computers could potentially crack using Shor’s algorithm.

The house-key style encryption (AES) is different. It doesn’t rely on those same math puzzles. Even with a quantum computer, breaking into AES-encrypted data would be like trying every possible combination on a lock with trillions of trillions of possibilities. Even quantum computers can’t check all those combinations in any reasonable amount of time.

The locks on your front door (AES encryption) are still strong against quantum computers. But the locks on your mailbox (RSA/ECC encryption) might need an upgrade.

Security experts are already working on new mailbox-style locks that even quantum computers can’t break. They’re called “post-quantum” or “quantum-resistant” algorithms. It’s like designing a new kind of mailbox that uses completely different mechanics to stay secure.

Imagine if locksmiths knew that a new tool for breaking certain locks was coming in a few years. That’s where we are with quantum computers. We’re not waiting until the last minute - we’re already building better locks.

What often gets missed

Symmetric encryption algorithms like AES are largely quantum-resistant already. They just need larger key sizes - think of it like adding a few extra pins to an already secure lock. It’s a simple upgrade to something that’s already working well.

Quantum computers are not some magic wand that breaks all encryption. Think of them more like a specialized lock pick - they’re really good at breaking certain types of locks, but completely useless against others.

It’s similar to how a master key might open all the doors in a hotel, but it won’t help you unlock your bike chain or open your garage door. Sure, quantum computers are incredibly powerful at solving certain math problems, but many of our everyday security systems use completely different methods that quantum computers can’t crack.

The headlines about quantum computers ‘breaking encryption’ miss this ESSENTIAL detail. Just because they can potentially crack one type of lock doesn’t mean all our security is doomed. In fact, most of the encryption protecting your daily life is already quantum-proof.

If you found this article helpful, you might enjoy my free newsletter. I share developer tips and insights to help you grow your skills and career.


More Articles You Might Enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you might find these related pieces interesting as well. If you like what I have to say, please check out the sponsors who are supporting me. Much appreciated!

Tech
3 min read

Open-source is where dreams go to die

Work for free and in return watch your passion get crushed by entitled users who are never satisfied

Feb 26, 2025
Read article
Tech
3 min read

LinkedIn is Drowning in AI Generated Content Slop

One-line paragraphs, LinkedIn broetry, and the inevitable 'Agree?' - welcome to your AI-generated feed

Dec 11, 2024
Read article
Tech
3 min read

You Don't Own Your Social Media Accounts

Social platforms promise exposure but quietly hold your audience hostage

Nov 28, 2024
Read article
Tech
3 min read

Ghost Jobs Should Be Illegal

How fake job postings became a systemic problem in tech recruiting

Nov 15, 2024
Read article
Tech
5 min read

VoidZero: Threat or Catalyst for Open Source JavaScript Tooling?

When Evan You announced VoidZero, I'll admit - I got excited. And a little nervous.

Oct 15, 2024
Read article
Tech
5 min read

Cloudflare's AI Content Control: Savior or Threat to the Open Web?

How Cloudflare's new AI management tools could revolutionize content creation, potentially reshaping the internet landscape for both website owners and AI companies.

Sep 24, 2024
Read article
Tech
3 min read

The Credit Vacuum

Being a developer sometimes feels like being the goalkeeper in a soccer match. You make a hundred great saves, and no one bats an eye. But let one ball slip through, and suddenly you're the village idiot.

Oct 7, 2024
Read article
Tech
3 min read

Google is Killing Information Economics on the Internet

Google’s Gemini pulls summaries from websites and slaps them directly into the search results

Sep 11, 2024
Read article
Tech
11 min read

Google's Journey: From Search Engine to Tech Giant

Exploring the key innovations and strategies that transformed Google into a global technology leader

Oct 1, 2024
Read article

Become a better engineer

Here are engineering resources I've personally vetted and use. They focus on skills you'll actually need to build and scale real projects - the kind of experience that gets you hired or promoted.

Many companies have a fixed annual stipend per engineer (e.g. $2,000) for use towards learning resources. If your company offers this stipend, you can forward them your invoices directly for reimbursement. By using my affiliate links, you support my work and get a discount at the same!


This article was originally published on https://www.trevorlasn.com/blog/quantum-computers-wont-break-encryption. It was written by a human and polished using grammar tools for clarity.