Up to date
Published
2 min read

Trevor I. Lasn

Staff Software Engineer, Engineering Manager

Code Wins Arguments

How Meta and other companies use the 'code wins arguments' mindset to turn ideas into reality

From Facebook’s S1 filing: “Rather than spending days debating whether a new idea is feasible or the best way to build it, engineers prefer to just prototype and see what works.”

Prototyping to Prove the Point

Meta’s development of its text feed feature is a great example. Before official approval, engineers had already built prototypes. Why? Because when there’s a working prototype, it’s hard to argue against its feasibility. Instead of getting bogged down in discussions, they demonstrated what was possible by building it.

This approach is common across many tech companies. Prototyping shifts the conversation from abstract ideas to concrete results. Code moves the debate forward and turns theory into progress.

A Tool, Not a Black Box

Prototyping isn’t about hiding away and coding in isolation. It’s a way to bring ideas to life and get feedback. Once you have something tangible, share it. You’re not building the final product in secret; you’re showing that the concept works.

At Stripe, engineers build prototypes even before full approval. It’s easier to demonstrate that something works than to convince others with words alone.

Google takes a similar approach. Design documents guide big projects, but a working demo speaks louder than any well-written plan.

If you’ve got an idea, build it. Don’t wait for endless meetings or approval. A working prototype not only proves your point but shows your commitment to solving the problem. It’s the fastest way to turn ideas into action and avoid unnecessary back-and-forth. Just remember, it’s a starting point—not the final product.


Found this article helpful? You might enjoy my free newsletter. I share dev tips and insights to help you grow your coding skills and advance your tech career.

Interested in supporting this blog in exchange for a shoutout? Get in touch.


Liked this post?

Check out these related articles that might be useful for you. They cover similar topics and provide additional insights.

Reflections
4 min read

Unrealistic Deadlines In Software Engineering

Unrealistic deadlines are more than just stressful—they set engineers up for failure

Sep 7, 2024
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

You Can Choose to Be Someone Who's Competent in Many Things, or Unbelievably Good at One Thing

Should you diversify your skills or specialize?

Sep 26, 2024
Read article
Reflections
4 min read

Become a Better Engineering Manager with JQL

Using Jira queries to understand engineering trends and drive improvements

Feb 11, 2025
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

Conway's Law: The Hidden Force Shaping Your Software Architecture

If you've ever wondered why your carefully planned software architecture ends up looking suspiciously like your org chart, you're not alone. Welcome to the world of Conway's Law.

Sep 24, 2024
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

Minimum Viable Documentation

How to create essential documentation that actually gets read and used.

Sep 27, 2024
Read article
Reflections
5 min read

Company Culture Happens Outside Management

Why real company culture grows from the ground up, not top down.

Sep 14, 2024
Read article
Reflections
3 min read

Internal Mobility

Just like a utility player on a sports team discovering their ideal position, internal mobility allows you to explore different areas of engineering and find your true passion.

Sep 23, 2024
Read article
Reflections
4 min read

High Performing Engineer Teams = motivation + enthusiasm + autonomy

Create the conditions where engineers want to excel and they'll surpass your expectations

Mar 7, 2025
Read article
Reflections
4 min read

Users Can Be Fired

Letting go of difficult or harmful users can be the key to maintaining the health and growth of your product

Sep 19, 2024
Read article

This article was originally published on https://www.trevorlasn.com/blog/code-wins-arguments. It was written by a human and polished using grammar tools for clarity.